On Sun, Jun 28, 1998 at 04:11:40AM -0700, SL Baur wrote:
I have tentatively approved Michael Sperber's plan for addressing
Lisp
Engine updates. As I understand it, it does not involve commitment to
anything specific until all the issues have been hashed out. It will
also involve an extended migration period of at least a year. I'm
less worried about that (so long as there's consensus on where we're
going) since the current development tree has been separated from the
release tree for at least that long.
Just to put some gasoline on the fire, what about and ILU-like
approach to extension language independence ?
ftp://ftp.parc.xerox.com/pub/ilu/ilu.html
We could have Common lisp, Java, Scheme and Perl simultaneously ;-)
OG.
PS: I think XEmacs is too old for such an approach, but anyway, the
idea is fun.