Hi,
Is there a specific reason that the ocaml package is called 'ocaml' and
not 'ocaml-mode'? The latter seems to be more consistent with other
similar packages such as ruby-mode and perl-mode.
I got triggered about this by a Gentoo feature request to rename the
package:
http://bugs.gentoo.org/show_bug.cgi?id=156943
I'd rather follow XEmacs package names, but I think the suggestion to
rename the package makes sense.
Kind regards,
Hans
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta