Re: [PATCH] special handling for `iso-next-group' is needed

Alexey> Currently XEmacs beeps and says "'iso-next-group' not Alexey> defined" when switching keyboard layout. Do you know of a good on-line (or off-line, it might be in my library) reference for these ISO layout management facilities (in English)? Is this ISO 9995 stuff? (An alternative reference, eg, ECMA, would be appreciated, last I checked my library did not have ISO 9995.) There is another patch pending to fix a small subset of the "millions of useful keysyms not recognized" problems we still have. If possible, I'd like to do something sane with all these keysyms (both the literal input ones and the keyboard control ones) at once. Alexey> Please, apply it to current beta or tell me why it is not Alexey> needed. Of course it's needed (or at least useful enough that something with equivalent effect should be applied, if it isn't). The reason things like this don't get applied is because they fix symptoms for a subset of users, but past history makes it plain that they frequently cause problems when we try to comply with standards or fix bugs for other users later. Help us be standards-conformant, please. I think that is the appropriate attitude to take in the development branch. -- Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences http://turnbull.sk.tsukuba.ac.jp University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Ask not how you can "do" free software business; ask what your business can "do for" free software.