Re: More GSoC project ideas.
* Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Unfortunately, we were unsuccessful this year.
Oh, bad luck. Sorry to hear that.
steve＠sxemacs: there's a meeting to explain the selection
criteria on
IRC Freenode #gsoc, 4/19 16:00 UTC -- which is 1 am for me and similar
for you, thank you very much Google! :-)
Yeah, it's like 2am for me... will be snoring my head off. I'm idling
in there now and Riece can log everything while I sleep. Do you want a
copy of the log?
I'm sure a better presentation of our ideas will help, and having
gone
through the procedure this year, I'm determined to do a better job
next year. We and SXEmacs should also consider combining efforts,
I'm determined to do it next year as well. Combining our efforts might
be problematic, but we should definitely discuss it further. It's a
good idea I think. Pencil it in for 2nd half of this year. :-)
Perhaps we could also work with GNU Emacs, but (for me at least)
that will depend on no interference from rms, who has a habit of
hogging resources.
For me, it'd be a show-stopper. I have a feeling that rms would be
against the idea of GSoC anyway.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| SXEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta