Re: [ANNOUNCE] Unsupported Package Directory in CVS

|--==> "VS" == Ville Skytt <Ville> writes: VS> Hmm, I set up my dir in a pretty ugly way, see README and INSTALL in VS> unsupported/scop/ [1], mainly because I really wanted to take full VS> advantage of the packages build stuff. But my setup still creates the VS> _pkg.el files. Is there a way to skip it using the official packages VS> build system? What I can do is put copies of the build tools that are in ./packages/ into ./packages/unsupported/. And then slightly modify them so _pkg.el files aren't built. It should be in CVS not long after you read this. The added advantage to this is that your Makefiles can be more or less identical to the "official" ones (you won't need the extra "../" for including XEmacs.rules). Actually, speaking of Makefiles, could you please set $(CATEGORY) to "unsupported". I'm going to use that field as part of the means for XEmacs to determine how to deal with each type of package. -- |---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 10D5C9C5>---| | XEmacs - It's not just an editor. | | It's a way of life. | |------------------------------------&lt;youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt;---|