Re: related to an XEmacs BTS

Stephen> With Roundup, entry of old mailing list posts as issues is Stephen> trivial, too. Of course that's unlikely to give appropriate Stephen> priority or keywords. Roundup has both e-mail and web interface so it seem to be capable. I haven't used it so I don't now if there are some dark corners. Are there? Stephen> What do you mean by "that seems essential"? I mean that a developer ought to be interested in the bugs that get filed. The job of ... Stephen> ... classify and prioritize them, identify duplicates, link Stephen> issues to relevant mailing list threads, and close fixed, Stephen> bogus, or unfixable issues. ... needs to be done anyway and also communicated back to the person filing the bug and the rest of the team whatever system there is. Stephen> However, http://www.xemacs.org/Develop/jobs.html says that Stephen> the "patch tracker must ensure that no patch falls down a Stephen> crack". If there are positive results with the BTS then a patch tracker is the next issue. ;-) Stephen> There's a big gap between those two! (Note that we do not Stephen> have anything resembling an active patch tracker at the Stephen> moment.) When I called for volunteers, I meant I want people Stephen> who will commit to putting effort into significantly Stephen> narrowing that gap. I'm afraid I don't understand. Yours -- %% Mats _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta