>>>> "Stephen" == Stephen J Turnbull
<turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
>>>> "ms" == Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
ms> would be much more natural, IMHO, to have a mule-lisp/
ms> directory alongside lisp/.
Stephen> Agreed, in principle. What's keeping me thinking is trying to figure
Stephen> out the impacts on other parts of XEmacs.
Stephen> Note how your paths-load-paths-depth -> paths-core-load-paths-depth
Stephen> change hosed the package build. Mule is much more pervasive.
Absolutely. On the other hand, it kaboomed right quick, so we should
know about any problems shortly after such a change. I do promise
fast turnaround for fixing any problems that occur.
Stephen> I realize this is a different kind of change, but this is the first
Stephen> time I've thought about it. I like the analogy to xemacs-packages vs
Stephen> mule-packages vs site-packages; risk should be low. But with 6 weeks
Stephen> to release, I'm nervous, OK? It's a big change, and you don't
usually
Stephen> do Mule, right?
Well, I guess I'll at least compile'n run with this now.
--
Cheers =8-} Mike
Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla