Re: Porting rebox2 and GNU Emacs portability
Reiner Steib writes:
On Fri, Nov 18 2011, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
> Marcus Harnisch writes:
>
> > ;; Is there any reason for having both, #'move-beginning-of-line and
> > ;; #'beginning-of-line?
>
> That is hideous. Who approved that, I wonder? Oh, I see. There's a
> distinction between logical order and display order, so this must be
> related to the recent introduction of bidi support in Emacs.
Nope, no relation to bidi:
,----[ ChangeLog.12 ]
| 2005-03-07 Kim F. Storm <storm(a)cua.dk>
|
| * simple.el (move-beginning-of-line): New command.
`----
This makes me sad.
>> (unless (fboundp 'move-beginning-of-line)
>> (defalias 'move-beginning-of-line 'beginning-of-line))
Is this code in a package?
AFAIK rebox2 is not a package distributed by XEmacs (not yet, anyway, I
don't know what Marcus's plan is). In any case, I assume the proposal
is to add the alias to XEmacs core or a standard compatibility package.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta