Re: Qt Xemacs ??

Will Qt Xemacs be able to exploit things like KIO_xxx? Network transparency in your editor kicks butt IMO. Kate will still be more flexible in this respect. Yes I know emacs can edit files via ftp. But what about SSH [KIO_FISH] and others? Maybe someday I will write that KIO_CVS stuff [experimentally at least] and then you can make little changes in CVS by "poking" instead of updating and recommitting. [Slow net connection people would like this???] Anyway its just a thought. I know lots of people would like Emacs to be as integrated as Kvim is. On Monday 06 May 2002 06:53 pm, Rodolfo Conde Martinez wrote: > -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE----- > Hash: SHA1 > > On Monday 06 May 2002 03:47, David Faure wrote: > > On Friday 03 May 2002 01:51, Rodolfo Conde Martinez wrote: > > > But as you said, XParts is still not fully operational and i would > > > like more a KPart xemacs that a xpart.... > > > > Read a bit about XPart. > > And XPart components "looks" like a KParts component to the hosting > > application, that's the whole point of it - no change required in the > > application, if it already supports embedding KParts components. > > i see, thats ok but i think having a native qt xemacs would be the best, > in that way xemacs can take full advantage of all the Qt stuff, > antialising, Xft extensions, themes, etc. and i guess having a native Qt > xemacs, from there it would be easy to do a Kpart for kde.....of course i > didnt mean XParts was bad, i just would prefer a native xemacs Qt (i dont > have TTF fonts inside xemacs, i had to install the xfstt server to have'em > :(, but lately that doesnt work, so im stuck with ugly fonts.....) and im > really dying to see xemacs inside KDevelop :):).... > > Cheers... > > > - -- > rcm. > rcm(a)gmx.co.uk > GPG Public Key: http://ada.fciencias.unam.mx/~rconde/rodolfo_gpg.txt > ICQ 118193727 > > >> Visit http://mail.kde.org/mailman/listinfo/kde-devel#unsub to > >> unsubscribe <<