|--==> "APA" == Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>>>"Charles" == Charles G Waldman
<Charles> writes:
Charles> Steve Youngs writes:
>>
APA> We don't plan to allow whitespace in
package names, do we?
>>
>>>It's not something I've thought
about, but I'd probably discourage
>>>it. I think whitespace in filenames/function & variable names is evil
>>>at the best of times.
Charles> While I have to agree with you about whitespace in names
Charles> of functions or variables, I have come to accept
Charles> whitespace in filenames as a normal part of life. A few
APA> Like that :-)
APA> Loading c:\Program Files\XEmacs\XEmacs-21.5-b2\etc\sample.init.el...done
Yeah but we all know that long filenames in Windoze is an absolute
joke. Hidden under that "Program Files" is a good ol 8.3 M$DOG
filename. The only reason those idiots at M$ implemented their
"pseudo" long filenames was so they could say "Hey look at us, we're
rilly kewl d00dz coz we got long filenames".
Sorry, got carried away. I'll get off my soap box now. My apologies
to anyone who was offended.
APA> My point is that above message goes to the message-log without
APA> quoting, so package messages should not have quotes around package
APA> names either.
APA> Perhaps we should instead decide that all file names written to
APA> messge-log SHOULD BE surrounded by double-quotes?
Hang on, now I'm confused. Do you want the quotes or not?
APA> I see it every that. If only MS succeeded to handle embedded WS in
APA> filenames everywhere. They don't! Sometimes you have to double-quote
APA> such names, sometimes not.
Gotta love em.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: 9E7E2820>---|
| XEmacs - It's not just an editor. |
| It's a way of life. |
|------------------------------------<youngs(a)xemacs.org>---|