Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
Mike Kupfer writes:
> In both cases, the specifier includes the format (xpm). So
there
> shouldn't be any need for XEmacs to guess the format, should there?
I guess not. I don't know why this happens. You can dig into the
specifier code if you like. It will be a couple of weeks before I
can, though.
Okay. It's not urgent for me because there's a workaround. I've put it
on my list, and we'll see who finds a round tuit first. ;-)
mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta