Re: Dynamically deriving major mode from prog-mode or fundamental-mode
* Sean MacLennan <seanm(a)seanm.ca> writes:
On Sat, 30 Mar 2013 09:04:04 +0900
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> If we put it in xemacs-base, it will have the same effect (if
you're
> missing xemacs-base, XEmacs turns into a better Notepad ;-), and we
> only have to maintain it once, and Vin doesn't need to make any
> decisions about it.
I would also prefer xemacs-base since then it would work with 21.4.
Yes, and I won't have to worry about it for SXEmacs. :-) xemacs-base is
the best place.
I wonder if anyone would ever get curious as to why something called
"prog-mode" wasn't in the "prog-modes" package? Meh, probably
not. :-)
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| SXEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta