Re: Building packages with 21.5b29?
Raymond Toy wrote:
On 2/14/11 1:29 PM, Aidan Kehoe wrote:
> Ah, thanks. I suspect 5dd1ba5e0113 has fixed this, can you try
again with a
> more recent build?
I clearly don't know how to drive hg. :-( I thought I was using
the
most recent version. I did an hg pull and hg update, but nothing is
added/updated.
I don't think you did anything wrong. 5dd1ba5e0113 is in
http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs, but not
http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs-beta. (Pushes are done to the
"xemacs" repo, then given a little soak time before being made available
from the "xemacs-beta" repo.)
$ pwd
/home/kupfer/xemacs/src/xemacs-beta
$ hg path default
http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs-beta
$ hg log -r 5dd1ba5e0113
abort: unknown revision '5dd1ba5e0113'!
$ hg incoming
comparing with http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs-beta
searching for changes
[...
long list of changesets that I haven't pulled yet, none of which
includes 5dd1ba5e0113
...]
$ hg incoming http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs
comparing with http://hg.debian.org/hg/xemacs/xemacs
searching for changes
[...]
changeset: 5356:5dd1ba5e0113
tag: tip
user: Aidan Kehoe <kehoea(a)parhasard.net>
date: Sat Feb 12 14:07:38 2011 +0000
summary: Be better about eliminating `block's that are not `return-from'd,
bytecomp.el
$
cheers,
mike
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta