Re: issues shown as "no priority set"

Vladimir G. Ivanovic writes: I don't see why. The only use-case I can see is for a volunteer like you to go through and set it, almost always to normal. I don't really see why accurate classification of "priority: unselected" is particularly important compared to reclassifying bugs that have incorrect priority, of which there are surely more than a few. OTOH, there are 43 issues with no module set and no priority set. I would like to see the modules classified and keywords added. But I think it would be basically harmless if all of them were set to priority: normal at once. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta