Re: Which package would be suitable for password.el?
Steve Youngs <sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au> writes:
> So it overrides XEmacs core elisp code, even though the core
code is
> buggy (see other discussion regarding run-at-time).
No it doesn't. It by-passes buggy package code. The XEmacs
`run-at-time' exists in the fsf-compat package.
Ah, ok.
> Another option is to rename the run-at-time hack to
> password-run-at-time and move the definition into password.el.
Bingo!
I'll install it. Thanks for your opinions.