Hi,
Here comes yet another status report from the project of converting to
GPLv3 or later.
There are two lists of files below. The first list contains all files
that are in an undecided state. Please inspect: Do we need to do anything
with them. If so what?
The second list contains all files that we can leave untouched and the
reason for that. Please inspect: Are all reasons OK and correct?
Are we getting close to the were an inspection of the xemacs-gplv3
repository could be performed? With the intent that it that is OK we
could merge back to trunk and go GPLv3 or later?
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"CHANGES-beta"
"ChangeLog"
"PROBLEMS"
"README"
"README.GPLv3"
"etc/ChangeLog"
"etc/Emacs.ad"
"etc/InstallGuide"
"etc/NEWS"
"etc/ONEWS"
"etc/OONEWS"
"etc/README"
"etc/editclient.sh"
"etc/emacskeys.sco"
"etc/emacsstrs.sco"
"etc/gtkrc"
"etc/package-index.LATEST.gpg"
"etc/sample.Xresources"
"etc/xemacs.1"
"lib-src/ChangeLog"
"lib-src/README"
"lisp/ChangeLog"
"lisp/README"
"lisp/mule/mule-locale.txt"
"man/ChangeLog"
"man/README"
"modules/ChangeLog"
"modules/base64/Makefile"
"modules/common/configure-post.ac"
"modules/common/configure-pre.ac"
"modules/zlib/Makefile"
"nt/ChangeLog"
"nt/Emacs.ad.h"
"nt/Installation.el"
"nt/README"
"nt/Win32.cf"
"nt/lisp.ico"
"nt/site.def"
"nt/xemacs.dsp"
"nt/xemacs.dsw"
"src/ChangeLog"
"src/README"
"src/README.kkcc"
"src/m/README"
"src/s/README"
"src/s/freebsd.h"
"src/s/irix6-0.h"
"src/s/netbsd.h"
"src/s/sol2.h"
"tests/ChangeLog"
"tests/Dnd/README"
"tests/automated/README"
"version.sh.in"
----------------------------------------------------------------------
These files below are the files that we might be able to leave as
they are. The reason for why they need not to be changed is listed
after each file: (Some reasons are taken verbatim from private
communication or the "GPL version 3 source survey")
----------------------------------------------------------------------
"INSTALL" -> old FSF Documentation
license
"config.guess" -> Part of config which is
still GPLv2 or later. See "http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/config"
"config.sub" -> Part of config which is
still GPLv2 or later. See "http://savannah.gnu.org/projects/config"
"etc/ETAGS.ChangeLog" -> BSD and GPL v2 or later
"etc/VEGETABLES" -> Not copyrightable.
"etc/XKeysymDB" -> MIT
"etc/ctags.1" -> Part of the etags
distribution, which is not part of XEmacs.
"etc/custom/example-themes/ex-custom-file" -> Generated(!?) or GPL V2
or later?
"etc/etags.1" -> Part of the etags
distribution, which is not part of XEmacs.
"etc/gnuattach.1" -> simple man link to
gnuserv.1
"etc/gnuclient.1" -> simple man link to
gnuserv.1
"etc/gnudoit.1" -> simple man link to
gnuserv.1
"etc/refcard.ps.gz" -> Generated from
refcard..tex
"etc/sample.Xdefaults" -> It is deprecated, so it
can be removed but is only a three line reference to .Xresources
"etc/xemacs-X.ico" -> GPLv2 or later but
there is not meta data for the file where this can be documented.
"info/dir" -> Generated(?)
"install-sh" -> MIT-style "no
advertising" license
"lib-src/b2m.c" -> This is the version
from GNU Emacs, so should be OK.
"lib-src/config.values.in" -> Generated.
"lib-src/emacs.csh" -> I don't think this
even works with XEmacs ("emacsclient"), so I believe we can just delete it.
"lib-src/insert-data-in-exec.c" -> Compatible license.
"lib-src/mmencode.c" -> Compatible license.
"lisp/dump-paths.el" -> Empty file. Not
copyrightable.
"lisp/term/bobcat.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt102.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt125.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt200.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt201.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt220.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt240.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt300.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt320.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt400.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lisp/term/vt420.el" -> Emacs version has no
explicit license declaration
"lock/.precious" -> Not copyrightable.
"modules/canna/install-sh" -> MIT
"modules/ldap/install-sh" -> MIT
"modules/postgresql/install-sh" -> MIT
"modules/sample/external/install-sh" -> MIT
"modules/sample/internal/install-sh" -> MIT
"move-if-change" -> Identical to GPLv3 or
later Emacs version
"nt/Xmd.patch" -> GPLv2 or later but only
a few lines
"nt/file.ico" -> MIT
"nt/minitar.c" -> Public domain
"nt/paths.h" -> Generated
"nt/xemacs.ico" -> GPLv2 or later but
there is not meta data for the file where this can be documented.
"src/alloca.c" -> Public domain.
"src/depend" -> Generated
"src/emacs-marshals.c" -> Generated.
"src/emacs-widget-accessors.c" -> Generated.
"src/intl-auto-encap-win32.c" -> Generated.
"src/intl-auto-encap-win32.h" -> Generated.
"src/libsst.c" -> Compatible license.
"src/libsst.h" -> Compatible license.
"src/libst.h" -> Compatible copyright.
"src/linuxplay.c" -> Compatible license.
(MIT-like)
"src/miscplay.c" -> Compatible license.
(MIT-like)
"src/miscplay.h" -> Compatible license.
(MIT-like)
"src/nas.c" -> Compatible license.
(MIT-like)
"src/paths.h.in" -> Generated.
"src/s/openbsd.h" -> Too short. (< 10
lines)
"src/s/usg5-4-2.h" -> Too short. (< 10
lines)
"src/sunplay.c" -> Compatible copyright.
"tests/gtk/UNIMPLEMENTED" -> Does notes need a
license?
"tests/tooltalk/beeps.el" -> Too short. (< 10
lines)
----------------------------------------------------------------------
Yours
--
%% Mats
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta