Re: mapping of C-z

Kaarthik> [...] RT> Let me cast my vote for leaving it as it is. :-) RT> I also find it *way* annoying when I accidentally hit C-z instead of RT> C-x and my emacs window is gone and I'm now typing into something RT> else. Kaarthik> Well, I wouldnt have minded as much if the mapping was simply Kaarthik> undef-ed. But changing it drastically is something I didnt expect. Kaarthik> Imagine how much more annoying C-z is now for YOU yourself, when you Kaarthik> accidentally type 'C-z v v' instead of 'C-x v v'. Instead of just Kaarthik> iconifying and making you *think* it crashed, it actually deleted Kaarthik> everything upto the next 'v'. And zap-up-to-char doesnt wait for RET Kaarthik> either. It just does it. Undo is your friend. But C-z has been zap for quite a long time, hasn't it? (Or maybe I changed it for myself long ago, but I very rarely modify predefined keys because when I use someone else's xemacs, I'm really screwed.) Ray