Re: [AUCTeX-devel] Re: [comp.emacs.xemacs] AUCTeX 11.84 released

David Kastrup writes: 1. We want distributions containing binaries to be built in the context of the versions that we have in package CVS, so that we can be very sure that they will work in vanilla user installations. 2. We want something better than Fundamental mode to be available at zero extra effort to our users. (Ie, they have to install xemacs-base; if they do so by installing the SUMO, they're done.) 3. We want the development to remain in the hands of the upstream developers, and XEmacs package maintenance to be contributed by non-core-developers, wherever possible. 4. We prefer recent versions to older ones. Quite definitely, in that order. 1 and 2 are automatically accomplished by the current system. 3 and 4 are implemented as possible, based on user requests and time contributions by package maintainers and upstream and XEmacs developers. Speaking for myself, but AFAIK this is a reasonable reflection of a consensus of the XEmacs Review Board. _______________________________________________ XEmacs-Beta mailing list XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta