Re: [Bug: 21.4.14] xemacs crashes with gnus and byte-compiled trivial-cite
* Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>>>>> "SY" == Steve Youngs
<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au> writes:
SY> * Stephen J Turnbull
<stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
>> (Well, actually, Gnus is implicated in all currently known
>> crashes except for a few caused by Motif
[...]
SY> Is it true? Can you back that statement up? Or is it just
SY> that a lot of bugs you've come across lately seam to have been
SY> related to Gnus?
It's the latter
That's what I thought'd be the case.
My point isn't that Gnus is evil (or, if it is, it's my kind
of
evil), it's that you need something that exercises XEmacs severely
to get it to crash, but this also means it's hard to debug.
And I wonder how many bugs would go unnoticed/unfixed if it wasn't for
Gnus?
I mean, does -vanilla have any meaning when Gnus is loaded? ;-)
Of course it does, it's the flavour of the ice-cream you've got
stashed away in your freezer. But apart from that, no, not
really.:-P
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| XEmacs - The only _______ you'll ever need. |
| Fill in the blank, yes, it's THAT good! |
|------------------------------<sryoungs(a)bigpond.net.au>---|
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 256 bytes)