Re: package site information more dynamically updateable
* Adrian Aichner <adrian(a)xemacs.org> writes:
Ville Skyttä <scop(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Yes, sure, that's why I threw in the idea of moving these lists
> to xemacs-base... AFAICS, no new problems would be introduced by
> doing that compared to the current situation.
I agree and wouldn't object to this.
Let's see what others have to say about this.
I object. These lists don't change anywhere near often enough to
warrant them not being in core. Moving them out of core and into
packages is a step away from the goal of a working PUI in a
"packageless" XEmacs.
IMO, PUI should work from `xemacs -no-autoloads'.
--
|---<Steve Youngs>---------------<GnuPG KeyID: A94B3003>---|
| I am Dyslexic of Borg. |
| Fusistance is retile. Your arse will be laminated. |
|------------------------------------<steve(a)sxemacs.org>---|
Attachments:
- attachment.sig (application/pgp-signature — 256 bytes)