Re: point-at-{eol,bol}
Lars Magne Ingebrigtsen <larsi(a)gnus.org> writes:
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> writes:
> > Under Emacs, these newish functions are called `line-end-position'
> > and `line-beginning-position'. It would be nice it the same was the
> > case under XEmacs.
>
> Oh, so Stallman has ignored the existing XEmacs name once again.
Yes. But I think these names are better names than the ones I
originally came up with -- point-at-{eol,bol}.
This was my first thought too, but remember that we already have
`point', `point-min', and `point-max'. I see nothing wrong with
`point-at-eol' and `point-at-bol'.
If we do change the name, then we also have to support the old names.
Which sounds like needless work to me.
--
Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr> | Student at FER Zagreb, Croatia
--------------------------------+--------------------------------
Oh lord won't you buy me a color TV...