Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
> 2. remove `reftex-label-regexps' and stick to matching
only
> \label{...} labels without being able to match other things that
> also produce labels
> (or even simpler: remove the "?1" from the first regexp in
> `reftex-label-regexps' and delete the second regexp. Also make it
> to a `defconst' to indicate that nobody should touch it.)
Do you mean a split in code here?
wrapped around a
(when (featurep 'xemacs)
Simplified version
)
something like this?
What I mean is exactly this:
--8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8---
(if (featurep 'xemacs)
(defconst reftex-label-regexps '("\\\\label{\\([^}]*\\)}"))
(defcustom reftex-label-regexps
'(;; Normal \\label{foo} labels
"\\\\label{\\(?1:[^}]*\\)}"
;; keyvals [..., label = {foo}, ...] forms used by ctable,
;; listings, minted, ...
"\\[[^]]*\\<label[[:space:]]*=[[:space:]]*{?\\(?1:[^],}]+\\)}?")
"List of regexps matching \\label definitions.
The default value matches usual \\label{...} definitions and
keyval style [..., label = {...}, ...] label definitions. It is
assumed that the regexp group 1 matches the label text, so you
have to define it using \\(?1:...\\) when adding new regexps.
When changed from Lisp, make sure to call
`reftex-compile-variables' afterwards to make the change
effective."
:version "24.4"
:set (lambda (symbol value)
(set symbol value)
(when (fboundp 'reftex-compile-variables)
(reftex-compile-variables)))
:group 'reftex-defining-label-environments
:type '(repeat (regexp :tag "Regular Expression"))))
--8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8---
Suppose I come up with a solution the way you suggest it. Would you
then include the corresponding patch to reftex?
I've already committed the above to the emacs-24 branch which is synced
also to master regularly.
I'm closing this bug.
Bye,
Tassilo
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta