Re: Sounds -- .au, .wav, or both?
At 12:13 AM 5/24/98 -0700, SL Baur wrote:
They probably should be put in a package, regardless.
Is there any platform that absolutely requires .au and cannot handle
.wav?
If we need both, it will definitely have to be a package and we'll
have to upgrade the sound playing code to have lists of valid
extensions so that `play-sound-file' can Do The Right Thing and either
play "im_so_happy.au" or "im_so_happy.wav" as the situation warrants.
What's the outcome of this?
andy
---------------------------------------------------------------------------
" .sigs are like your face - rarely seen by you and uglier than you think"
Dr Andy Piper, Technical Architect, Parallax Solutions Ltd
mail: andyp(a)parallax.co.uk web: www.parallax.co.uk/~andyp