Re: LDAP extended and revamped
Oscar Figueiredo <Oscar.Figueiredo(a)di.epfl.ch> writes:
But I wonder if it's really worth cluttering the code with such
a
compatibility hack when nobody will actually need it as soon as EUDC
an W3 are updated. I agree compatibility *is* a MUST for features
that are widely used. I believe the LDAP API currently is not.
I agree with you. Backward compatibility is a good thing, but it is
not required in all cases.