Re: scheme - my opinion
>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
sb> Stephen J Turnbull <turnbull(a)sk.tsukuba.ac.jp> writes:
> (I may be overdoing that) to using the new native Lisp. As
> slow as that's going to be, it could theoretically wait on
> improvements in the Scheme modules:
sb> You're probably right on that. It could also theoretically
sb> wait on improvments in Freed CL implementations too.
Well, actually, if the CL path works out, we won't have to wait. CL
already has nearly everything, especially if Bruno comes through with
the projected threads etc for CLisp.
A very strong argument for CL, no doubt about it.
But all that nearly everything doesn't come free.
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +1 (298) 53-5091