Re: Faster lisp engine
Olivier Galibert wrote:
> By the way, I don't think that the lisp engine itself is
that much of
> a bottleneck in XEmacs, so we should not be looking at a replacement
> lisp engine specifically for a blazing fast XEmacs.
I think that lexical scoping would make a huge difference by allowing
much tighter optimizations of the compiled code.
Strong typing probably wouldn't hurt either.
--
Glynn Clements <glynn(a)sensei.co.uk>