Re: xemacs: couldn't deduce a bold version of the font
Rodney Sparapani writes:
I was having some trouble with font warnings with beta (and stable
too I
think). On Solaris 10, check the settings in /etc/default/init
It ships with LANG=en_US.UTF-8 which was causing me the trouble so I
switched that to LANG=en_US.ISO8859-1 I tried to use xfontsel to find
a font with UTF-8 encoding, but I didn't see any. YMMV
This is probably a bug in XEmacs, but I'm not sure how to deal with
it. The problem is that IMO there should be *no* -*-UTF-8 fonts, as
UTF-8 is not a coded character set. The coded character set is
ISO10646-1, aka Unicode. Probably we should be translating that LANG
setting to search for ISO10646-1 fonts in the font selection code
somewhere, although I think there's an initialization that puts it in
there.
Could you guys provide the output of "xlsfonts -fn '-*-utf-8'" and
"xlsfonts -fn '-*-iso10646-?'" for me?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta