Re: making MINIMAL-TAGBITS the default
SL Baur wrote:
Richard Coleman <coleman(a)math.gatech.edu> writes in xemacs-beta(a)xemacs.org:
> I thought the plan was to eventually make MINIMAL-TAGBITS
> on by default.
[snip]
I think the code is pretty well shaken down. Have you compared code
size between having it enabled and disabled? Enabling MINIMAL-TAGBITS
results in a substantial size increase.
What is the general view on code _speed_? If I recall correctly, on
non-Mule native-build Windows/x86 running some benchmarks with gung-ho
was (very marginally) slower. Is this the general experience?
Jonathan.
--
Jonathan Harris | jhar(a)tardis.ed.ac.uk
London, England | Jonathan.Harris(a)symbian.com