Re: [AC] Re: [PATCH 21.5] Allow autoloaded DEFUN

[Moved from xemacs-patches] Steve Youngs <youngs(a)xemacs.org&gt; wrote: Now that is has been committed, I am having second thoughts. This still isn't right for modules. That function (check_sane_subr) shouldn't have any assert()s in it at all. It should throw something if the conditions fail to hold (e.g., two modules define a function with the same name). Since this will be during module load time, that will cause the module loader to give a failure message and halt the loading. I think I should look for a reasonable way to handle something being thrown if this is *not* in a module, and make a new patch to that effect. Opinions? -- Jerry James http://www.ittc.ku.edu/~james/