Reply-To set to xemacs-beta.
Reviewers:
Does anybody have any object to releasing the devguide, given that it
will be marked draft/best-current-practice, rather than "policy"?
Mike Kupfer writes:
The latest general-docs package (vers 1.04, in stable) is 2 years
old
and doesn't contain the Developers Guide that Stephen added. Will a new
release of the package be happening sometime soon, or do I need to build
the Developers Guide from CVS?
I have made local changes to that which should be included; given the
current inactive state of most review board members, I propose marking
it clearly as a *draft* and *best current practices*, and otherwise
y'all should trust me :-) (or start patching it), and we'll ship it.
Mike, if you want a copy now, build from CVS, but be aware that it's
superseded. Since you're the MH-E guy, you may wish to also review
the MH-E version, which had very heavy influence on the XEmacs DG.
Steve
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta