bzip support in crypt
James LewisMoss writes:
I checked the mailing list and other than a discussion on whether
distributing xemacs as bz2 I didn't find this. Let me know if I
missed anything. Also, for things like this is it better to find an
upstream maintainer for what is in the xemacs cvs xemacs-packages
module or to just submit here? for the moment I'll just submit this
and let someone tell me I'm wrong.
crypt++ is maintained by Karl Berry <kb(a)cs.umb.edu>. Off the top
of my head I can't think of any reason our version would be
different, except perhaps for MULE backs. I'm using that version
of crypt ather than the packaged one and it works fine for me.