Re: User submitted Install How To
Raymond Toy writes:
Perhaps there are still performance problems, but machines are way
faster now than when Mule was added. At least I don't notice anything
for the kinds of editing and mail and news that I do. (Maybe I would
if I ran xemacs without Mule?)
If you ran VM for mail with 50MB+ mboxes or JDE on Java modules >
400KB you'd notice, I assure you. :-)
Maybe most people wouldn't notice. I suppose we could try enabling
Mule, and see if anybody screams in pain. Unfortunately, Xft requires
a lot of work before that's a reasonable thing to do IMO, because I
see no good reason to expect that bug reports will be addressed in a
timely fashion (except for an automatic "patches welcome" from me :-( ).
Steve
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta