>>>> "ms" == Michael Sperber
<sperber(a)informatik.uni-tuebingen.de> writes:
ms> The locking policies can be controlled through three
ms> mechanisms (by descending precedence):
ms> - Specification on the movemail command line.
ms> - Specification of an environment variable EMACSLOCKMETHOD
ms> with the same possible values as the --mail-locking argument
ms> to configure.
ms> - Configuration via autoconf and src/config.h.
Obviously XEmacs shouldn't be allowed to specify locking methods not
implemented on the system in question. How do you plan to handle that
given the precedence specified above? Or is this not a problem?
Maybe XEmacs should bitch on startup (disabled through a site-start
facility) if the environment variable or the 'mail-lock-variable is
set to something strange for the system. We've already had one
incident where somebody made a RedHat package using flock when all of
the Linux MTAs use file locking. I don't know how this would be
implemented, though :-(
--
University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN
Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091
__________________________________________________________________________
__________________________________________________________________________
What are those two straight lines for? "Free software rules."