Re: Speed difference in Gnus
Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
>>>>> "Simon" == Simon Josefsson
<jas(a)extundo.com> writes:
Simon> Uwe Brauer <oub(a)mat.ucm.es> writes:
Simon> Kill the buffer " *nnimap *ucimap.ucm.es" (note leading SPC).
>> If someone could suggest me how to enhance the testing in order to
>> localise the problem...
Simon> Instrument imap* and nnimap* for ELP. Note that nnimap is
I did elp-instrument-package gnus (which I thought include everyting)
No, the (nn)imap functions in Gnus doesn't use the gnus function name
prefix, you need to instrument them manually. Same for message, mm,
pgg, sieve etc.
Simon> likely to be slowed than nnml, but I'm not sure
what
Simon> magnitude of "slower" you are talking about here.
Get stacked, I mean not doing anything (xemacs) compared to perform a
operation (gnu emacs)
Aha. Ok. That's bad.