Re: Proposed version number change for 21.2

"sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org&gt; writes: sb> There wouldn't be a 21.2. That's part of the point. There would sb> be a 21.2.XX where XX is the number where we finally release. This seems unnecessarily confusing from a user's perspective, unless 21.2.XX is going to be publicly released for more than one value of XX. Additionally, I think there is a risk that users will think that the software is a for-gurus-only version if the XX is anything other than zero. Many people can't write the two-element version test correctly --- and here you go adding a third element :-)! Eric. PS --- Does anybody remember the days when the third element was incremented every time you build Emacs on your own system? -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Eric Eide <eeide(a)cs.utah.edu&gt; . University of Utah Dept. of Computer Science http://www.cs.utah.edu/~eeide . +1 (801) 585-5512 voice, +1 (801) 581-5843 FAX