On Wed, 2002-08-28 at 05:59, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
     Ville> But I don't think that patch does The Right Thing. 
The
     Ville> patch unconditionally removes *menubar*Font entries in
     Ville> Emacs.ad, which I think will screw people not building
     Ville> --with-xfs.  As long as RH is building --with-xfs, they can
     Ville> safely apply it.
 
 Ah, OK.  Just uncomment the menubar*FontSet part.  If --with-xfs=no,
 XEmacs totally ignores FontSet resources.  If --with-xfs=yes, XEmacs
 prefers the FontSet resource, then falls back to the Font resource.
 Ie, the #ifdef'ing is done by XEmacs resource management.  ;-) 
Allright, neat.  The patch has just appeared in xemacs-patches.
     Ville> :/ I've been working a bit with the spec file for
the RPM
     Ville> they have in rawhide, and as of now, AFAICT all my fixes to
     Ville> it have been applied (except for upgrading to 21.4.9) in
     Ville> the latest RPM, 21.4.8-16 (not at 
ftp.redhat.com yet).
 
 It's not the sanity of their XEmacs that's at issue.  Although I rant
 about them and Mandrake, it's free software.  They can and should do
 what they like---as long as they don't ask _us_ to support _their_ users. 
Agreed, but I'm afraid they don't have to ask.  At least some of their
users will just ask us directly :/  We benefit from distros providing
better XEmacsen too.
-- 
\/ille Skyttä
ville.skytta at 
xemacs.org