Re: fix for redisplay!

Hrvoje Niksic <hniksic(a)srce.hr&gt; writes: I don't know if I'd call it offensive or not. :) Emacs/W3 has it's uses, and is mainly useful for dealing with online documentation, _real_ content sites, etc. For web sites that try to be 'fun' and are more marketing oriented, I could give a shit about, so I don't really try to support them as well as I could. Emacs/W3 came about due to my frustration at trying to use ancient versions of Mosaic and the old linemode browser from CERN and seeing that they completely sucked. Lynx wasn't much better when it showed up either. So in a midnight-8a consulting shift at the IU computing labs, Emacs/W3 was born. And I've lived to regret it. :) Most browsers today aren't any better, at least from my usability perspectives. The fact that you cannot even use the keyboard to navigate in mozilla is completely bogus. And actually _doing_ anything with the information you get in the browser window is still pretty frustrating. IE does a hell of a lot more of what I'd want a browser to do than netscape ever has, mainly due to my bitching and whining at chris wilson and other people I know on the team over there for the last 3 years, but it still doesn't go far enough. Which is why I still hack on Emacs/W3 when I can. I've been doing a LOT of Qt hacking for work lately (dont ask :), and bopping back and forth between Emacs/W3 visiting the documentation, C-mode buffers, compilation buffers, etc, etc, is very very nice. But if you want to visit someplace with loads of tables and images in them, and that is the ONLY way to get the information, then something else is probably better. Like whacking the content provider over the head with a very large stick. :) Or using another browser. -Bill P.