Re: psgml DTDs - from where?

When I did a psgml update in early 2000, I noticed that many of the psgml files had Ben Wing's fingerprints on them. It might help to ask him. At that time, some of the DTDs were way out of date, so I did some work on updating them, and threw a few new ones in, based on an informal unscientific poll: <URL:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=psg0uvpfpb.fsf%40diannao.ittc.uk... I now think that that was a mistake.

> Rather than make an update, why don't you split it out as a separate > package? That way the XEmacs package can correspond more closely to > the upstream. I think we should get out of the business of supplying DTDs entirely. Many people have perfectly good sets of DTDs already and don't need us supplying old ones. We should probably provide pointers to places where popular DTDs can be acquired, and possibly package up only the HTML DTDs in a separate package. That would help us avoid complaints like this one: <URL:http://groups.google.com/groups?selm=m3lmy5te33.fsf%40maya.linux.ca>