Re: Qt Xemacs ??
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
On Tuesday 30 April 2002 07:29, pax! wrote:
Simon Josefsson writes:
> On 30 Apr 2002, Stephen J. Turnbull wrote:
>
>
> And here he seems to be OK with linking GPL code to GPL code. I suspect
> there was misunderstandings and/or typos involved here.
>
> I agree completely that noone shouldn't spend time getting Qt to work
> under Windows. The license issues is problem enough, but there doesn't
> seem to be any technical merits either. I mean, doesn't Windows users
> like the Windows behaviour better than Qt?
>
> > N.B. None of the above is a promise, just a suggestion for how you
> > can get started and eventually merge to trunk if things go well.
>
> Unless it turns out to be easy, I'm not doing it all. My main interest
> is the KDE KPart stuff, so if it is possible to do that without the Qt
> widget stuff (which I actually suspect), that's where I'll put my
> energy.
So do I. I'm interested in supporting Kde and KParts in particular,
not Qt. So there is no problem at all with GPL.
Ok, so it seems to be more interests in the KParts that a qt widget, im
interested in this too, so if everything is ok with the license now it would
be good to do a KPart XEmacs and yes maybe do something like Stephen said,
all of us interested in it could start planning by private email....gee i
didnt really think that my little mail with subject QT Xemacs would have such
answer:):).....thanks all.....
if KDevelop can get xemacs as the core editor it will be DEFINITY BETTER that
any one of the Visual Studio apps.....:):):).....
Regards....
- --
rcm.
rcm(a)gmx.co.uk
GPG Public Key: http://ada.fciencias.unam.mx/~rconde/rodolfo_gpg.txt
ICQ 118193727
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.0.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: For info see http://www.gnupg.org
iD8DBQE8zypgx2Sktruwba0RAjWLAKCSOnnNBCDzvUjsLr+pjLg4OpnkSACgnY7a
JFZbZXNafP4svg/n9aVbUO8=
=+oIJ
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----