Re: Which is the best XEmacs interface to git?
Trimming some CCs who are probably more interested in magit than in
defface (and are mostly on -beta anyway).
Mats Lidell writes:
Seems like GNU does not require ATTS in SPEC in defface to be a
list!?
(Although the docs does not clearly state this.)
[...]
I guess we should change defface to allow for this, or?
Probably. The GNU syntax is more concise and prettier. The question
is if any XEmacs code depends on some interpretation of (A B C)
currently, vs. (A (B C)). That's bad practice but could happen I
suppose.
Steve
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta