Re: vc-revert-buffer1 sacrifices fontification preserving minor modes
>>>> "APA" == Adrian Aichner
<aichner(a)ecf.teradyne.com> writes:
>>>> "sb" == SL Baur <steve(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
>> Should sample.emacs be changed if lazy-lock-mode is really
>> lazy-good-for-nothing-lock?
sb> If we must recommend defaulting to lazy font-locking, then it should
sb> probably be the lazy-shot flavor. At least that version works in an
sb> XEmacs-y sort of way.
APA> Which font-locking method do we want to promote?
But lazy-shot has the same font-locking problem: revert-buffer
doesn't fontify the buffer.
Ray