Re: a neat idea from Paul Eggert on emacs-devel
Michael Sperber writes:
"Stephen J. Turnbull" <stephen(a)xemacs.org> writes:
> Jerry James writes:
> > On Wed, Jul 27, 2011 at 10:47 PM, Stephen J. Turnbull
> > <stephen(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> > > Any of them that should be defaults IYHO?
> >
> > Perhaps --with-mule and --with-pdump.
>
> Where is --with-pdump NOT the default these days? (I can answer that
> for myself if you don't have time, of course.)
Itanium, I believe.
I suspect I don't really care if Itanium gets pdump. My understanding
is that Itanium is a huge mess anyway because of the function pointer
issue. Has that changed?
Which CPUs are Itanium, anyway? Just those explicitly branded
Itanium, or is that design used in more recent Intel offerings?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta