-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1
Is there an established procedure for dealing with bugs like the
following? Is there an established for noticing & tracking security
issues?
I am unaware of any process for doing either. I happened to stumble
upon this one simply because it was visible without having to scroll
my browser window.)
Absent any instruction, I will file a high priority bug. (Is it
possible mark bugs as security-related in Tracker?)
- --- Vladimir
http://lwn.net/Articles/320484/
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Severity: Normal
Title: GNU Emacs, XEmacs: Multiple vulnerabilities
Date: February 23, 2009
Bugs: #221197, #236498
ID: 200902-06
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - -
Synopsis
========
Two vulnerabilities were found in GNU Emacs, possibly leading to
user-assisted execution of arbitrary code. One also affects edit-utils
in XEmacs.
Background
==========
GNU Emacs and XEmacs are highly extensible and customizable text
editors. edit-utils are miscellaneous extensions to XEmacs.
Affected packages
=================
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Package / Vulnerable / Unaffected
-------------------------------------------------------------------
1 app-editors/emacs < 22.2-r3 >= 22.2-r3
*>= 21.4-r17
< 19
2 app-xemacs/edit-utils < 2.39 >= 2.39
-------------------------------------------------------------------
2 affected packages on all of their supported architectures.
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Description
===========
Morten Welinder reports about GNU Emacs and edit-utils in XEmacs: By
shipping a .flc accompanying a source file (.c for example) and setting
font-lock-support-mode to fast-lock-mode in the source file through
local variables, any Lisp code in the .flc file is executed without
warning (CVE-2008-2142).
Romain Francoise reported a security risk in a feature of GNU Emacs
related to interacting with Python. The vulnerability arises because
Python, by default, prepends the current directory to the module search
path, allowing for arbitrary code execution when launched from a
specially crafted directory (CVE-2008-3949).
Impact
======
Remote attackers could entice a user to open a specially crafted file
in GNU Emacs, possibly leading to the execution of arbitrary Emacs Lisp
code or arbitrary Python code with the privileges of the user running
GNU Emacs or XEmacs.
Workaround
==========
There is no known workaround at this time.
Resolution
==========
All GNU Emacs users should upgrade to the latest version:
# emerge --sync
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=app-editors/emacs-22.2-r3"
All edit-utils users should upgrade to the latest version:
# emerge --sync
# emerge --ask --oneshot --verbose ">=app-xemacs/edit-utils-2.39"
References
==========
[ 1 ] CVE-2008-2142
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-2142
[ 2 ] CVE-2008-3949
http://cve.mitre.org/cgi-bin/cvename.cgi?name=CVE-2008-3949
- --
Vladimir G. Ivanovic
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.4.9 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora -
http://enigmail.mozdev.org
iEYEARECAAYFAkmnB4wACgkQtoykdjDhdFu4XACbBWK0IOolc4zzXyW43288rcQH
AXQAnAzQEwzjR1SGqMnUc5q96RqpuQCj
=YpdN
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta