Re: GPLv3 packages?
Mats Lidell writes:
>>>>> Stephen J Turnbull <stephen(a)xemacs.org>
writes:
That is true but if the goal is to make XEmacs GPLv3 too and we show
that we are working on that I hope some migration period surely would
be acceptable.
Maybe. Ask Cisco about that. Or Peter Deutsch. I think it's likely
that the FSF would make demands at a time we didn't want to make the
effort to comply, because we were short of manpower (not out of
malice, Murphy's Law). I think we're reasonably on track, we don't
have the manpower to do much syncing anyway, so let's just get it
done.
Stephen> We also need to coordinate the whole thing with SXEmacs.
What is the position of the SXEmacs project on GPLv3?
That's not for me to say, but SXEmacs is not licensed under GPLv3 at
the present.
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta