Vladimir G. Ivanovic writes:
OK, I don't get it. What criteria puts an issue in the "no
priority
set" list?
What it says: there is no priority set. Good question, though.
Some *do* have a priority set, e.g. #374
Actually, I don't think that #374 does have a priority set. What you
are seeing is the "issue editor" view. In the nature of an editor
interface, the values you see are not the current values, but the
values that the attributes will get if you press "submit changes". Of
course, for most issues those "default edited values" will be
initialized to the current values.
When priority is currently "--unselected--", the default edited value
is forced to "normal" to ensure that priority would automatically get
a sane value as soon as the issue is edited, even though those fields
are marked as "not interesting to ordinary users".
This could be implemented to show the current value in the "issue
editor" view, but automatically force it to "normal" if set to
"--unselected--". It would take a fair amount of effort, though,
because I haven't learned to hack that part of Roundup yet. The
implementation I used just required a 40-byte Python expression. :-)
Now that it's been explained, do you think it would help other users
if I changed it?
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://calypso.tux.org/cgi-bin/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta