Didier Verna writes:
Mats Lidell <matsl(a)xemacs.org> wrote:
> I haven't got the time now to test this but I really like
the idea. I
> will come back and test this eventually. But why not add this to the
> packages?
Sure. Maybe Norbert could suggest which one is the most appropriate. I
can then push it.
Gnus, of course. Isn't everything cool in Gnus? Er, on second
thought, xemacs-base.
Rationale: It should be where pretty much every package can depend on
it without requiring Gnus. ;-)
_______________________________________________
XEmacs-Beta mailing list
XEmacs-Beta(a)xemacs.org
http://lists.xemacs.org/mailman/listinfo/xemacs-beta