I would like to add hppa2.0{w,n} to the set of supported
architectures. According to config.sub there to possible pattern to
report to the user:
# CPU_TYPE-MANUFACTURER-OPERATING_SYSTEM
# or in some cases, the newer four-part form:
# CPU_TYPE-MANUFACTURER-KERNEL-OPERATING_SYSTEM
What would a string of type two look like!? Would hppa2.0n and
hppa2.0w be a valid string describing the architecture? Please note
the {w,n} expand to wide (64bit kernel) and narrow (32bit kernel) and
are closely related to the HP compiler architecture switches.
See the attach patch how the changes would look like.
--- config.sub Mon Jan 3 15:06:03 2000
+++ config.sub.orig Mon Jan 3 15:02:28 2000
@@ -152,7 +152,6 @@
tahoe | i860 | m32r | m68k | m68000 | m88k | ns32k | arc | arm \
| arme[lb] | pyramid | mn10200 | mn10300 | tron | a29k \
| 580 | i960 | h8300 | hppa | hppa1.0 | hppa1.1 | hppa2.0 \
- | hppa2.0n | hppa2.0w \
| alpha | alphaev5 | alphaev56 | we32k | ns16k | clipper \
| i370 | sh | powerpc | powerpcle | 1750a | dsp16xx | pdp11 \
| mips64 | mipsel | mips64el | mips64orion | mips64orionel \
@@ -177,7 +176,6 @@
| mips-* | pyramid-* | tron-* | a29k-* | romp-* | rs6000-* \
| power-* | none-* | 580-* | cray2-* | h8300-* | i960-* \
| xmp-* | ymp-* | hppa-* | hppa1.0-* | hppa1.1-* | hppa2.0-* \
- | hppa2.0n-* | hppa2.0w-* \
| alpha-* | alphaev5-* | alphaev56-* | we32k-* | cydra-* \
| ns16k-* | pn-* | np1-* | xps100-* | clipper-* | orion-* \
| sparclite-* | pdp11-* | sh-* | powerpc-* | powerpcle-* \