Some time ago, Oliver Graf wrote...
|+
| SL Baur <steve(a)vmailer.xemacs.org> writes:
|
| > Per Abrahamsen <abraham(a)dina.kvl.dk> writes:
| >
| > > And according to the FSF interpretation[1] of the Qt and GPL licenses,
| > > distributing a linked binary would thus violate the GPL.
| >
| > Why isn't this an issue with a Motif-linked XEmacs? Because Motif can
| > usually be considered a system library?
|
| This is a good point! My linux had no Motif 'til a bought one for about
| $100. And so I think this is commercial also.
|
| Motif allows dynamic as well es static linking for distribution (I bought a
| developers license), Qt allows the same, Xforms (another good example) also,
| only GPL collides with it... but nobody cares.
Is Solaris libc free? :)
Kirill