Re: ha ha, only serious

Stephen> It's not clear to me that TTY or specifiers are actual problems, if we Stephen> treat KHTML as a back-end to redisplay.c a la Bill P's Stephen> suggestion. As far as I understand the redisplay engine, it works at a far lower level of abstraction than KHTML, so I don't think that'd be a viable fit: all the layout and stuff is pretty much backend-independent; the rediplay backends just ship out the bits to the display. Stephen> On the other hand, I note that the message you cite names 6 presumably Stephen> full-time developers. That's a lot of manpower compared to what we Stephen> have available, so there could be a fair amount of effort hidden in Stephen> the "thin compatibility layer" by XEmacs Project standards. Yeah, but judging from the total size of the code, I'm assuming it's reasonable. -- Cheers =8-} Mike Friede, Völkerverständigung und überhaupt blabla