Re: [BUG] introduced in supercite ?

Barry doesn't need to see this thread. Excess addresses pruned. Stephen> Unless either Raymond or Barry has something to say about Stephen> it, I would say submit a patch to xemacs-patches revert Stephen> that section to the upstream original. For discussion Stephen> purposes, here's my diff. The Ray> Of course if you do this, you'll hose me! Unless customize Ray> handles those lists better now.... I'm sympathetic, but the Supercite documentation says that the other example should work. It's a pretty common usage, I think. I use it :-) so I'm not exactly unbiased. Still.... Since your description suggests this is a Customize usage problem (or maybe a bug in Customize), I would suggest talking at the Customize folks. And don't even think about updating your Supercite package until this is resolved. (It's not like Supercite changes much....) That can probably be accomplished by moving supercite to ~/.xemacs/xemacs-packages/ and using the pui stuff to delete it from the pui database. Alternatively, if you update from CVS, make the change locally and when you update from CVS you'll get "conflict" (the first time) and "locally modified" (after that) status, but it will leave your change in place. Just be careful to not send that part in as a patch again :-) -- University of Tsukuba Tennodai 1-1-1 Tsukuba 305-8573 JAPAN Institute of Policy and Planning Sciences Tel/fax: +81 (298) 53-5091 _________________ _________________ _________________ _________________ What are those straight lines for? "XEmacs rules."